Cancellation Policy Wrong loan
In the case of loans or loan agreements with incorrect revocation policies, the customer has the option to revoke the loan agreement. Right of Withdrawal With loans and / or loan agreements with revoked cancellation policy, the client has the option to terminate the loan agreement. The financial benefits to the chargeable and / or bank customers can be very large. Loan agreements or loan agreements for real estate held after 10.6. 2010 were closed with a false cancellation policy, are still revocable.
The revocation policy also refers to credits or loans such as: I. Loan agreements that are not real estate loan agreements. which were completed before 11 September 2002 or after 11 June 2010. The real estate loan agreements that were negotiated in the period from September 1, 2002 to and including March 10, 2010 under fulfilled and not yet fulfilled until 21.5.2016 under both contractors.
Many loans entered into between 11 June 2010 and 22 March 2016 (entry into force of the Credit Directive for Residential Property) can still be withdrawn. The credit agreements with respect to frequently also listed legal requirements regarding the cancellation policy are not met. For the loan contracts with incorrect cancellation policy, which were concluded after May 11, 2016, the possibility of opposition is limited to one year and 14 days.
This is especially true for loan contracts, which was used for real estate financing.
Of particular importance is the fact that the credit company can not charge any fees early repayment penalty and for the benefit of the consumer. A further plus point of a contradiction for The borrower has the possibility to count his past achievements to 100 per cent on the loan. Due to a right of revocation, the lender can only claim repayment from a market interest rate (for loans before 13.06.2014).
At the same time, the payments made by the borrower are offset against the same interest. However, most institutions insist that the revocation policy was correct, so that the situation does not benefit consumers. Although case law clearly benefits consumers, financial institutions are still trying to demand unauthorized access to claims.
Even with the lawyer’s agency, the out-of-court agreement with the banks is difficult, so that the claims of the consumers can usually only be successfully enforced in the appeal proceedings. An exact calculation of the reversal of a revocation is complex and time-consuming, since all facts are taken into account. For this purpose we have to use special software that immediately charges the respective claims (bank against private consumers and private consumers against the bank).
If the reversal is economically advantageous for you, all options for enforcing your claims against the house bank are discussed.